Are applicable to current rights violations under Neurostrike technology conditions.
In other words, none of the current conditions worldwide under the technology are acceptable or to be tolerated at any time.
Article 3, Article 5, Article 7, Article 8, Article 12, Article 13, Article 18, Article 19, Article 20, Article 22, Article 23, Article 24, Article 25, Article 27, Article 28,Aticle 29 and Article 30.
Allan H. Frey was the first American to publish on the microwave auditory effect (MAE). Frey's "Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy" appeared in the Journal of Applied Physiology in 1961.
In his experiments, the subjects were discovered to be able to hear appropriately pulsed microwave radiation, from a distance of a few inches to hundreds of feet from the transmitter.
In Frey's tests, a repetition rate of 50 Hz was used, with pulse width between 10–70 microseconds.
The perceived loudness was found to be linked to the peak power density, instead of average power density.
At 1.245 GHz, the peak power density for perception was below 80 mW/cm2.
According to Frey, the induced sounds were described as "a buzz, clicking, hiss, or knocking, depending on several transmitter parameters, for example, pulse width and pulse-repetition rate".
By changing transmitter parameters, Frey was able to induce the "perception of severe buffeting of the head, without such apparent vestibular symptoms as dizziness or nausea".
Other transmitter parameters induced a pins and needles sensation.
Frey experimented with nerve-deaf subjects, and speculated that the human detecting mechanism was in the cochlea, but at the time of the experiment the results were inconclusive due to factors such as tinnitus.
Auditory sensations of clicking or buzzing have been reported by some workers at modern-day microwave transmitting sites that emit pulsed microwave radiation. Auditory responses to transmitted frequencies from approximately 200 MHz to at least 3 GHz have been reported.
The cause is thought to be thermoelastic expansion of portions of auditory apparatus, and the generally accepted mechanism is rapid (but minuscule, in the range of 10−5 °C) heating of brain by each pulse, and the resulting pressure wave traveling through the skull to the cochlea.
In 1975, an article by neuropsychologist Don Justesen discussing radiation effects on human perception referred to an experiment by Joseph C. Sharp and Mark Grove at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research during which Sharp and Grove reportedly were able to recognize nine out of ten words transmitted by "voice modulated microwaves".
Although it's been reported that "power levels required for transmitting sound... would cause brain damage due to... thermal effects" the pops associated with the microwave audio effect are not sustained over time, and the effect is due to brief, sudden, increases in temperature.
So while threshold levels of for the microwave audio effect of 267mW/cm² for 1.3GHz and 5000mW/cm² 2.9GHz, respectively, were reported by Frey in 1961, for the peak amplitude (providing the pops) and would only give an average (sustained) power density of only 0.4mW/cm² and 2mW/cm² respectively similar to current cellphones.
However, it's been argued that despite waves the microwave auditory effect only constituting a rapid 10−6 °C rise in temperature, for threshold peaks on each pulse, that, at the least, a strong peak of around 1400 kW/cm² (1.4 billion mW/cm²) would certainly be harmful due to the resulting pressure wave.
References:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14250-microwave-ray-gun-controls-crowds-with-noise/
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=8iIlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA125&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
This is not a show, these are real life events.
This is the attacking groups main source of information: The group in this area hacks phones and intercepts calls, watches whats on screen, covers up websites with false sites, adds contacts, send messages and accesses app using phone hacking tools.
When they hit the lights with an energy weapon it has a emp effects on the lights, but they use a repeating voice recording, so the light flicks are based on vocal recordings, creating a visual light form of the sound with a subliminal message, but it is not very effective.
Some of the lights like the road bollards near the roundabout and corner junctions are designed to flick, the street lighting is being fired apon.
I have a form of synesthesia that allows me to hear the sound in my mind of the messages in the flicking lights, others can do it too if they focus enough on it. I am not sure if it is exactly synesthesia, as others can do it, but once you notice, it is hard not to notice...
These recordings are on main profile (Facebook.com/zelldot) not the Cat Ghost profile (Facebook.com/cat.ghost.felix)
Part 1:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1125023328458836&id=501298438
Part 2:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=831967204970777&id=501298438
Part 3:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=161468446974780&id=501298438
Part 4:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=24077694161822047&id=501298438
Part 5 (Most important part):
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=719799043244602&id=501298438
Part 6 (Bet more! They own this shop!):
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=958860568550542&id=501298438
Lights tonight (Just the lights cut together with no sound) - Clear your mind, listen to what the lights say into your mind, subliminal messaging, sound removed to remove bias, all across Harlow, Essex, not just the bollards or street lights.
Lights across Harlow silent, no sound cut, with links to the original uncut videos:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/E2V6F8W1gWBkAukh/
This one was taken down the next day, my phone picked up the sounds:
Are applicable to current rights violations under Neurostrike technology conditions. In other words, none of the current conditions worldwid...
